As AI systems become more autonomous, the debate over legal liability and responsibility for AI failures or unexpected behavior is intensifying among policymakers and legal experts.
A new ranking identifies the U.S. metropolitan areas where artificial intelligence is poised to have the greatest impact on the workforce and local economies.
As AI systems become more autonomous, legal experts and policymakers are debating who should be held liable for damages caused by AI failures, ranging from developers to users.
The US General Services Administration issued a new acquisition policy for AI technologies across federal contracts, establishing guidelines for procurement, risk management, and vendor accountability.
Dartmouth College has launched an internal review and faces student backlash after its provost admitted to using generative AI to draft an official campus communication.
An essay from Goshen College examines whether academia can simply ignore the rise of generative AI, highlighting the practical challenges of resistance versus institutional adaptation.
A new lawsuit alleges that sports betting company DraftKings used artificial intelligence algorithms to identify, target, and exploit problem gamblers to maximize platform revenue.
Lawmakers are pushing to hold artificial intelligence developers legally liable for the outputs and actions of their models, aiming to increase corporate accountability as automated systems proliferate.
Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok reportedly advised Donald Trump on foreign policy matters, encouraging actions to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
A Council on Foreign Relations analysis characterizes Donald Trump’s AI safety framework as toothless due to a lack of enforcement, while outlining strategies to establish credible, binding governance.